Rural economic revitalization within rural territories has become a strategic priority in recent development agendas due to intensifying poverty, widening regional inequalities, persistent rural out‑migration, stagnation in traditional agricultural systems, and chronic infrastructural deficiencies. As a foundational pillar of sustainable development, revitalizing rural economic systems is essential for achieving balanced national growth and strengthening the socio‑economic resilience of rural communities.This study aims to identify the essential requirements and determinant factors shaping rural economic revitalization through a qualitative meta‑synthesis grounded in Roberts’ research synthesis methodology. A systematic search of national and international academic databases during 2015–2025 resulted in the identification of 150 relevant articles. Following rigorous screening, eligibility assessment, and full‑text content analysis, 50 high‑quality studies were selected as the final analytical corpus. The findings indicate that rural economic revitalization is inherently multidimensional, requiring the integration of modern agricultural systems in rural territories, improved infrastructure and basic services, strengthened human capital through vocational and technical training, and the development of cultural industries and creative tourism. Additional key drivers include spatial planning, territorial restructuring, and the adoption of inclusive digital finance. The active engagement of local institutions, universities, and private‑sector actors in forming supportive networks and innovative ecosystems further contributes to rural economic dynamism. By synthesizing dispersed empirical evidence, the study constructs a coherent analytical framework demonstrating that the convergence of modern agriculture, efficient infrastructure, skilled human capital, cultural and tourism‑based industries, and innovative financial mechanisms can collectively facilitate sustainable rural economic revitalization and enhance the quality of life in rural territories. This conceptual model not only clarifies the core mechanisms of revitalization but also offers practical strategies for strengthening resilience and improving rural well‑being.