Economic Geography Research

Economic Geography Research

Identification and Analysis of Structural Barriers to the Development of Pedestrian Transportation)Case Study: Central Urban Area of ​​Ahvaz(

Document Type : Research Article

Author
1. Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Abstract
With the transition from the "vehicle-centric" paradigm to "human-centric urbanization", pedestrian transportation is recognized as one of the main pillars of sustainable urban development. Meanwhile, the central fabric of Ahvaz has a high potential for regeneration due to the high density of activities; however, the dominance of vehicular infrastructure and physical challenges have posed numerous structural barriers to pedestrianization. The present study, with the aim of analyzing these barriers, identified 18 main barriers through the Delphi technique and the opinions of 50 experts and analyzed them using interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and MICMAC analysis. The results of this systematic analysis show that pedestrian barriers in Ahvaz are locked in a six-level and interconnected causal-disability system. In this structure, the most influential functional-traffic and management barriers act as the root drivers and core of the crisis and reproduce the physical complications (such as insufficient sidewalk width) at the upper levels of the model. Finally, the results showed that any one-dimensional and purely physical intervention, without controlling the root drivers, is doomed to failure and waste of resources due to the systemic nature of the barriers. Therefore, achieving sustainable pedestrianization in Ahvaz requires adopting a comprehensive and synchronized approach that prioritizes changing the paradigm from car-centric to human-centric, reforming macro-traffic policies, reviewing land use management, and implementing climate defenses. Only by reforming these fundamental nodes can the physical nodes be opened and, by improving access and security, injecting a spirit of vitality into the historic heart of the city.
Keywords

Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga, A. M., Alvarez, V., & Henao, C. A. (2020). Urban walkability considering pedestrians’ perceptions of the built environment: a 10-year review and a case study in a medium-sized city in Latin America. Transport reviews, 40(2), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842
Bereitschaft, B. (2017). Equity in microscale urban design and walkability: A photographic survey of six Pittsburgh streetscapes. Sustainability, 9(7), 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071233
Chen, D. R., & Lin, Y. C. (2016). Social identity, perceived urban neighborhood quality, and physical inactivity: A comparison study of China, Taiwan, and South Korea. Health & Place, 41, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.06.001
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
Dovey, K., & Pafka, E. (2020). What is walkability? The urban DMA. Urban Studies, 57(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819727
Dzisi, E. K., & Tetteh Appiah, I. (2026). State of walkability within the Central Business District of Accra: a case study of infrastructural and perception-related issues. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 14(1), 2624223. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2026.2624223
Edamuriyil Chacko, A., Pawar, N. M., & Chauhan, R. (2026). Modeling the role of supporting infrastructure, concerns, beliefs, risk factors, and perceived safety on pedestrians’ walking tendency. Traffic Injury Prevention, 27(1), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2476608
Erturan, A., & van der Spek, S. C. (2022). Walkability analyses of Delft city centre by Go-Along walks and testing of different design scenarios for a more walkable environment. Journal of Urban Design, 27(3), 287-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2021.1988543
Hossain, M. S., & Ariffin, A. R. M. (2026). WALKABILITY IN ASIAN CITIES: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF HIGH-DENSITY URBAN ENVIRONMENTS. Journal of Surveying, Construction and Property, 17(1), 74-96. ps://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JSCP/index
Khan, F. A., & Tabassum, N. (2024). Assessing walkability in Dhaka’s Central Business districts. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 27, 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101184.
Komarica, J., Trpković, A., & Glavić, D. (2025). Rethinking sidewalk usability: Between design standards and real pedestrian needs. Transportation Research Procedia, 91, 656–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.10.084
Lee, R. J., Rueda, S., Brown, K., Zhai, W., Ochoa, E. L., & Coleman, E. (2026). Walkable but Not Walkable? A Mismatch Between Urban Heat and Pedestrian-Oriented Environments in Promoting Equitable Climate Resilience. Sustainable Cities and Society, 107622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2026.107622
Liao, B., van den Berg, P. E., van Wesemael, P. J., & Arentze, T. A. (2020). Empirical analysis of walkability using data from the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 85, 102390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102390
Litman, T. (2020). Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning. https://trid.trb.org/View/1678741
Meselhe, A., Cox, D. T., Sanderson, D., & Tilt, J. H. (2026). Human-centered transportation connectivity and network recovery following a Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake and tsunami. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 11(1), 32-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2025.2525697
Mubiru, J., & Evdorides, H. (2026). Pedestrian safety in developing countries: A systematic literature review and gap analysis. Future Transportation, 6(1), 29. DOI:10.3390/futuretransp6010029
Ntakana, K., Mbanga, S., & Botha, B. (2022). The significance of safety and security in urban public space design for sustainability. Journal of Public Administration, 57(2), 262–271. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362733502_The_Significance_of_Safety_and_Security_in_Urban_Public_Space_Design_for_Sustainability
Parajuli, A., & Pojani, D. (2018). Barriers to the pedestrianization of city centers: perspectives from the Global North and the Global South. Journal of Urban Design, 23(1), 142-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1369875
Reisi, M., Nadoushan, M. A., & Aye, L. (2019). Local walkability index: Assessing built environment influence on walking. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, (46), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/19457
Ribeiro, J. T., Vieira, A. R., Rosado, S., & Serdoura, F. (2021). Urban planning revolution for increasing pedestrian mobility in Lisbon, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC210071.
Satispi, E., Widyajasita, A., & Herliani, D. (2023). Pedestrian development in supporting sustainable community mobility. In Environmental Issues and Social Inclusion in a Sustainable Era (pp. 375-383). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003360483-43.
Sodikov, J., Musulmanov, K., & Adizov, D. (2026, March). Sustainable urban transport: Integrating pedestrian and bicycle lanes with the public transport system. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3374, No. 1, p. 050098). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0317124.
Sukor, N. S. A., & Fisal, S. F. M. (2020). Safety, connectivity, and comfortability as improvement indicators of walkability to the bus stops in Penang Island. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 10(6), 6450-6455. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3849
Wong, T. Y. (2020). Assessing and improving work-related walkability in the central business district of Hong Kong. HKU Theses Online (HKUTO). http://hdl.handle.net/10722/294749.
Yang, M., & Zacharias, J. (2016). Potential for revival of the bicycle in Beijing. International journal of sustainable transportation, 10(6), 517-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2015.1012281.
 Zafri, N. M., & Sevtsuk, A. (2026). Advancing pedestrian models: a comparative review and vision for the future. Journal of the American Planning Association, 92(3), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2026.2618643.
Volume 7, Issue 23
Spring 2026
Pages 188-207

  • Receive Date 20 July 2026
  • Revise Date 29 August 2026
  • Accept Date 31 August 2026